| POWERSERVE
Electrical Safety and Protection Technologies
|
|
INTRODUCTION: Isolated electrical power systems have been in use in hospital operating rooms and critical care areas since the 1940’s. Their primary purpose was to prevent the possibility of electrical arcs and sparks which could provide a source of ignition for flammable anesthetics. The use of flammable anesthetics was discontinued in the U.S. in the 1970’s, however, the use of isolated power systems has continued because of the superior protection they also provide against electric shock in "wet locations". The techniques and devices utilized for monitoring the "electrical isolation" of these power systems have evolved over time due to technological advances as well as experience factors with electrical safety for patients and personnel within the operating room and critical care areas. Systems placed into service prior to 1971 typically used some variation of electromechanical devices which formed a balanced bridge. These units, called Ground Detectors, were simple in design, inexpensive to build and performed reliably within their limited sensing range. Common units were made by Crouse-Hinds (their GDA M2 and GDP devices) and Hevi-Duty (their Dynatector devices). The very notable disadvantage of these devices is their inability to detect balanced resistive and capacitive faults. In other words, if the ungrounded isolated power system became partially grounded through leakages that were equal in each conductor of the system, the Ground Detector would not recognize or sound an alarm in response to this fault condition. These inherent sensing limitations led to the design of subsequent generations of newer devices called Line Isolation Monitors or LIMs. The aforementioned "experience factors" have progressively instigated many significant changes and new requirements in the NEC – NFPA 70 Article 517 and NFPA 99 – Standard for Health Care Facilities Section 3. Installation and periodic testing requirements have become significantly more stringent in the areas of line-to-ground fault detection and annunciation; grounding and ground system impedance; system leakage levels; and applied fault testing.
NFPA 70 (NEC) and NFPA 99: What is said about Ground Detection systems in these applicable Codes? Each version of NFPA 70 (NEC) and NFPA 99 since the early 1970’s has clearly identified the requirements for fault detection in Isolated Power Systems (IPS). These requirements have included the use of Line Isolation Monitors (LIMs). Most importantly, it must be understood that with the 1971 edition of NFPA 56A (now known as NFPA 99) Ground Detectors were banned for new construction and effectively rendered technologically obsolete. As the focus on electrical safety in the operating room changed from primarily explosion prevention to heightened concern over patient and personnel electrical safety, experience indicated that isolated power system monitoring needed to be improved. In order to provide this required enhancement in electrical safety to patients whose body resistance was vastly reduced due to invasive procedures and the presence of fluids, new monitoring technology was developed which resulted in the introduction of new devices known as Line Isolation Monitors or LIMs. Even the early LIMs provided fault detection far beyond the capabilities of the obsolete Ground Detectors - particularly in the case of capacitive faults, hybrid (resistive and capacitive) faults, and balanced L1 & L2-to-ground faults. For these reasons, and in an effort to provide maximum electrical shock protection to patients and mitigate risk in the OR, many hospitals began retrofitting old Ground Detectors with new Line Isolation Monitors. This practice continues today. NFPA 70 and NFPA 99 closely parallel each other with regard to Isolated Power Systems and should be used together as resource documents. Further, JCAHO Environment of Care guidelines for electrical systems maintenance and testing reference NFPA 99 as a fundamental base document. There is some confusion over a statement contained in NFPA 99 Annex 2 wherein it states: This statement pertains to applications within flammable anesthetizing locations only. This Annex 2 in NFPA 99 is titled "Flammable Anesthetizing Locations". It is noted in this section of NFPA 99 that flammable anesthetics are no longer used in the U.S.. It acknowledges that some countries outside the U.S. which still use flammable anesthetics utilize this document and its’ safety measures. So, within the U.S. it is not appropriate to leave ground detectors in service based on this statement in Annex 2. To do so is a misinterpretation of the standard. Since flammable anesthetics are no longer in use in the U.S. the continued need for isolated power systems and line isolation monitors is based primarily on electrical safety in "wet locations". As such, the rules to be followed are found within NFPA 70 – Article 517 and NFPA 99 – Section 3. Specifically, refer to NFPA 99 (1999 Edition) Section 3-3.2.1.2(f)1 Wet Locations found on page 25: What does all this mean? It means that unless the Isolated Power System meets all the criteria set forth in Section 3 (and Ground Detector systems do not) the only basis for leaving them in service is by fulfilling the requirements stated in "Exception No. 2" above. This means that the hospital must:
What this says is that it is acknowledged that the "pre-Line Isolation Monitor systems" (Ground Detection systems) provide minimal capability for fault detection and patient protection from electric microshock - remember these systems were put in place to prevent arcs, sparks and explosions of flammable anesthetics. So, as a "stop-gap measure" the Code states that the grounding system must, at least, perform in a manner that will minimize the risk of excessive millivolt potential differences and microshock to the patient. Regular periodic testing is the only way to determine the impedance levels within the grounding system. PITFALLS / RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH CONTINUED USE OF GROUND DETECTORS:
SOLUTION: Clearly, the best solution is to abandon this technology which is now (4) generations old. Not only is the Operating Room one of the hospital’s highest revenue generators – it is also, uniquely, an environment where many advanced technologies and techniques merge and where patients are at their most vulnerable state. Vigilant risk management acknowledges that the low per unit cost of upgrading these systems, along with the required periodic testing program, is a very small price to pay for avoiding patient electrical harm or sentinel events. Any Ground Detector in an Isolated Power System can be retrofitted with a Line Isolation Monitor (LIM). Additionally, old remote alarm units inside the OR or at the Nurse Station are typically replaced in conjunction with a LIM retrofit. Following LIM retrofits, the Isolated Power Systems must be performance tested via the "applied fault method" to ensure proper performance and the systems must be integrated into the hospital’s "Utility System Management Plan" (JCAHO Environment of Care – EC.2.14). Periodic testing is required every (6) months for analog LIMs and every (12) months for automated self-diagnosing LIMs. This testing is accomplished in the most thorough manner by experienced personnel utilizing specialized test equipment. COMPARING VINTAGE GROUND DETECTION SYSTEMS TO MODERN LINE ISOLATION MONITORS IN THE OPERATING ROOM
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Send mail to webmaster@powerserve-ips.com with
questions or comments about this web site.
|